← Search

Irene Rindfleisch

Rigby, ID
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 32W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Irene Rindfleisch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Parkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-03 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Venita Petti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Parkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Barbara Baker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Aimee Rathburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Rathburn · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mandy Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-27 · Rathburn · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Rathburn · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mandy Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2025-08-04 · Forever Fun & Fabulous · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Head
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-21 · Schenk's Fabulous Forties · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Marlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-14 · Schenk's Fabulous Forties · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-08-03 · #3 Doubles · with Marie Parkinson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 53% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 40.8% of games
6.0
51.6%
16W–15L · 52.7% of games
7.0
6.7%
1W–14L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert