← Search

Lauren Drew

BOISE, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 66W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lauren Drew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Honey Badgers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Vincent Ta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Trever Browne mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-31 · Deucebags 9.5 · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jack Yount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Deucebags 9.5 · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Dan Buckingham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Honey Badgers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chad Vincent mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Deucebags 9.5 · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jack Yount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
Emily Paulson / Nik Yip
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Alec Tzeng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Emily Paulson / Nik Yip
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Dylan Raymond championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · Terminetters · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Terminetters · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Terminetters · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Spencer Woods championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
82.9%
34W–7L · 67.4% of games
10.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.8% of games
8.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 58% of games
9.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 50.5% of games
9.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams