← Search

Linda Western

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 105W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Linda Western to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history188 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Pour Decisions · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Pour Decisions · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Baskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Pour Decisions · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-03 · Pour Decisions · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Return of the Smack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelley Canning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Return of the Smack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-07 · Shot Sisters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Kowallis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Mixed Marvels · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · Shot Sisters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · Mixed Marvels · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alex Raymond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · Mixed Marvels · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Meibergen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · Shot Sisters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Perlaky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 61% of games
4.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 45.9% of games
4.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 55.1% of games
8.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 22.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
18W–14L · 51.5% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 51.9% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
10W–6L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams