Rafael Lozada
Libertyville, IL
365 matches · 247W–118L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Rafael Lozada to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history365 matches
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18M4.0 8.RT Rus Sun 4 $29
CHI E 40M4.0 5.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $29
CHI E 40M4.5 1.Tam Needler Sat 5 $25
CHI E 55M8.0 1.RT Chopp Sun 4 $29
CHI E M18.8.0 1.Tam Wright Sat 7 $25
CHI E M18.9.0 2.Wilm Nakamura Sun 11 $20
CDTA E 18&OM4.0 2RT Ciuca Sun 4 $27
CDTA E 40&OM4.0 1RT Ciuca Sat 4 $27
CDTA E M18&O8.0 1Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
CDTA S 55&OM8.0 3.RT Chopp Mon 7 $27
CDTA S ComboX7.5 4.Wilm Wright Fri 7 $22
CDTA S M18&O8.0 1.Tam Wright Tue 7 $22
CDTA W 18&OM4.0 4.RT Ciuca Sun 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OM4.0 1.RT Ciuca Sat 4 $27
CDTA W 40&OM4.5 2.Tam Needler Sat 5 $22
CDTA W 55&OM8.0 1.RT Chopp Sun 4 $27
CDTA W ComboX7.5 3.Wlmt Wright Fri 7:30 $20
CDTA W ComboX8.5 1.Tam Wright Sat 5 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 3.Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
CHI F CX7.5 9.Wilm Wright Fri 7 $20
NITA W 80MX55b Naperville-Matkovic
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 56.3% of games
3.5
84%
21W–4L · 62.7% of games
4.0
68.3%
71W–33L · 57.8% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 46% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.5% of games
8.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.6% of games
9.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.7%
24W–9L · 56.4% of games
7.5mixed
81%
17W–4L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
70.7%
53W–22L · 58.1% of games
8.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 49.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.6% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
90 matches
#1 Singles
3%
11 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.