Teams

NITA W 80MX55b Naperville-Matkovic

2026 NITA2 Winter Mixed 55 & Over · NITA Winter 55&Over 8.0 Mixed

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-10vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJin-Won Lee / Stephanie Batka vs Bruce Thornquist / Vicki Mitchell1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Lozada / Rafael Lozada vs Bill Bowman / Joan Labue5-7, 1-6
2026-03-27vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Charlie Turri vs Vicki Mitchell / Jay Goldner6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonna Matkovic / Joseph Costigan vs Bill Bowman / Joan Labue6-7, 2-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRafael Lozada / Patricia Lozada vs Lisa Korte / David Maxson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Danson / Cindy Sullivan vs Laura Skuja / Kevin Podwika5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiedre Dunn / Charles Schinzer vs Debbi Landorf / Bill Bowman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Matkovic / Joseph Costigan vs Lisa Korte / David Maxson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-20vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Sullivan / Charlie Turri vs Craig Berry / Sally Berry6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Danson / Stephanie Batka vs Marilyn Tansey / Kevin Podwika1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Lozada / Rafael Lozada vs Jill Kenney / Robin Kiamco6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-06vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Nelson / Charlie Turri vs Sally Berry / Craig Berry2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEric Danson / Stephanie Batka vs Laura Skuja / Kevin Podwika3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Matkovic / Brian Johnson vs Debbi Landorf / Bill Bowman6-7, 3-6
2026-01-30vs NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-PodwikaLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Rafael Lozada vs Vicki Mitchell / Bruce Thornquist6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCindy Sullivan / Charlie Turri vs Craig Berry / Sally Berry7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie McNeel / Richard McNeel vs John Laurx / Debbi Landorf2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NITA Winter 55&Over 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 80MX55a Naperville-Podwika6216819163
2NITA W 80MX55b Naperville-Matkovic2681638265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Rafael Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.03
Diedre Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Donna Matkovic
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Cindy Sullivan
published 4
3.74
Charlie Turri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Eric Danson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Brian Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jin-Won Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Patricia Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Charles Schinzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joseph Costigan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Nelson
published
Patty Lynch
published
Richard McNeel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie McNeel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rafael Lozada + Patricia Lozada8354% games+5.7% vs expected
Stephanie McNeel + Richard McNeel171451% gamesnot enough data
Donna Matkovic + Joseph Costigan3251% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Batka + Brian Johnson1437% gamesnot enough data
Donna Matkovic + Brian Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Batka + Eric Danson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rafael Lozada
223W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
4.5
Diedre Dunn
99W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Donna Matkovic
167W–127L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Cindy Sullivan
76W–48L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Charlie Turri
150W–125L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Eric Danson
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Brian Johnson
91W–91L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jin-Won Lee
7W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Patricia Lozada
164W–140L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Charles Schinzer
44W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Joseph Costigan
42W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Nelson
86W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Lynch
28W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard McNeel
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie McNeel
59W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.