← Search

Cynthia Knox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park Forest, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 9W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history38 matches
W
2026-07-18 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 3.PF Egbuna Sat 4 $24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arinze Egbuna mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · CDTA S M18&O7.0 3.PF Egbuna Sat 4 $24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Primer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Micchelli
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
L
2025-09-28 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Harper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-13 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marjorie McGuire
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-12 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Geri Harston
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-30 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Harper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-16 · NITA S 70W55a Challenge-Sharp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kharma Paige
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-2
W
2024-12-07 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diedre Castaldo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2024-10-06 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajita Chander
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-14 · NITA E 70W55e Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marjorie McGuire
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-12 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Castro
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 37% of games
7.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 36.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal