← Search

Elizabeth Castro

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LYNWOOD, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 2W–7L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history9 matches
L
2025-08-03 · NITA S 65CWe Park Forest-Stenoish · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Zalewski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-24 · NITA S 65CWe Park Forest-Stenoish · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jerry Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-27 · NITA S 65CWe Park Forest-Stenoish · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jan Lachenberg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-06-12 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Knox
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-05 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Forney
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-17 · NITA S 35W40k Park Forest-Mullady/Kennedy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Gillstrom
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2020-03-06 · M18&O 7.0X Wimbledon Janzen Fri 7:30 $18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dwight Janzen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2019-11-02 · M18&O 7.0x Wimbledon Janzen Fri 7:30 $18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Calegan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2018-09-23 · NITA E 35W18f Challenge Fitness (Papiernik/Mullady · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Mullady
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.1% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe