Rod Ganesan
Chicago, IL
216 matches · 135W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Rod Ganesan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history216 matches
W
Chad Anderson / Howard Gartzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18M3.5 1.Tam Bhat Sun 11 $25
CHI E 18M4.0 7.ACN Hui Fri 7 $24
CHI E 40M3.5 2.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $25
CHI E M18.7.0 5.McF Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CHI E M40.7.0 6.RT Schoyer Sat 2 $29
CDTA E 18&OM3.5 4Tam Bhat Sun 11 $22
CDTA E 18&OM4.0 10Glen Tysl Sun 5 $30
CDTA E 40&OM3.5 2Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 6McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CDTA E M40&O7.0 2Tam Lam Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA E M40&O8.0 4Nbrk Marberry Sat 3 $28
CDTA S 40&OM3.5 1.Tam Bhat Tue 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25
CDTA S M18&O7.0 5.McFet Baltazar Sat 5 $25
CDTA S M40&O7.0 5.Tam Lam Fri 7 $22
CDTA S M40&O8.0 1.Nbk Marberry Tue 7 $28 $28
CDTA W 18&OM3.5 8.Tam Bhat Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 18&OM4.0 13.Gnbk Hui Sun 5 $30
CDTA W 40&OM3.5 2.Tam Bhat Sat 5 $22
CDTA W M18&O7.0 4.McFet Baltazar Fri 8 $25
CDTA W M40&O7.0 1.Tam Lam Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W M40&O8.0 4.Nrbk Marberry Sat 3 $28
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
51.5%
34W–32L · 54.4% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
76.6%
49W–15L · 62.4% of games
7.5mixed
60%
21W–14L · 56.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 53.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
65 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.