← Search

Kate Currier

Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
40 matches · 30W–10L · seasons 2026–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
4.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
22%
stay 4.0
78%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.96. Lower than today’s 4.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Chicago · 4.0
1 of 26
IL · 4.0
2 of 211
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Kate is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.4% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.9% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
Jennifer McClelland / Marie Reece
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chica Ida
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
Caitlin Ward / Tom Buergermixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tanner Roach
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
Sara Olson / Kim Kuwabara
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lydia Doyle
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sarah Haas / Rod Ganesanmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Kim
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Alexis Keener / Laura Keener
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Cattafesta
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
W
Miae Lim / Randee Saturno
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kajal Sangal
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Martha Davis
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Munteanu
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
W
Courtney Conway / Lisa Lowenthal
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Chang
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Koki Saito / Erika Matsumotomixed
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Youngbin Lim
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chica Ida
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Geoffrey Stone / Eva Szubzdamixed
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucas Majewski
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.