Kate Currier
Chicago, IL
51 matches · 40W–11L · seasons 2024–2026
Captains: add Kate Currier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history51 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E M18&O7.0 3Tam Leonardo Sat 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 3.Gnvw Sangal Mon 7 $21
CDTA S M18&O7.0 6.Tam Leonardo Sun 5 $22
CDTA S M18&O8.0 1.Tam Wright Tue 7 $22
CDTA S TriWHi 2.Tam Wright Sun 5 $22
CDTA S TriWLo 5.RT Ford Sat 2 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 1.Gnvw Sangal Sun 5 $21
CDTA W M18&O7.0 2.Tam Leonardo Sat 7 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 3.Tam Wright Sat 7 $22
NITA S 85CWc Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
90%
18W–2L · 66.5% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.2% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
15 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.