← Search

Teri Scaggs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 131W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Brown/Kim-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly McMahon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Brown/Kim-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly McMahon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Castro-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Min Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Castro-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sung Min Moon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-24 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 Castro-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christian Sarol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W Hoag-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
4.0
69%
29W–13L · 59.1% of games
4.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.1% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
89.2%
33W–4L · 66.6% of games
8.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.8% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 55.3% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.2% of games
7.5mixed
100%
11W–0L · 74.6% of games
8.0mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.3% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
43 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova