← Search

Beth Hoag

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 84W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Satomi Baumgartner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Su A Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Tracy
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Felina Kelly
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Scaggs championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Scaggs championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly McMahon
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
Default
2026-07-26 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Harmon-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Noel Castro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-01 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crist
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Novitsky-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Scaggs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
44.3%
31W–39L · 48% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 31.3% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 56.2% of games
7.5
57.8%
26W–19L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.1% of games
8.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King