← Search

Jamie Frey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
METAMORA, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 104W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history156 matches
W
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucinda Uphoff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lucinda Uphoff
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-09 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Rodeghero championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amalia Krecik championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amalia Krecik
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amalia Krecik
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bellamy
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Milton
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · MSIL A40&O 4.0W Uphoff-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Bellamy
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-07 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Evergreen · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charbel Saliba mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 40&O Evergreen · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Hamler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Campbell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 55% of games
3.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 64% of games
4.0
59.3%
16W–11L · 55.4% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.7% of games
7.5
77.8%
21W–6L · 63.7% of games
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 63.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal