← Search

Felina Kelly

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 96W–44L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-10-25 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Wang -Champaign · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with James OH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Su A Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · MSIL 7.5W Fall Combo Ottemann/Tracy-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Jackson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-10-18 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kim
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Wang -Champaign · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James OH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-03 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Hoag
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-26 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Tracy
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Brinkman-Peoria · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Reed Stoewer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-20 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Brinkman-Peoria · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Reed Stoewer mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Brown-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Novitsky
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 8.0 Brinkman-Peoria · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shaan Kashyap mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
14W–0L · 72.3% of games
4.0
57.5%
23W–17L · 52.4% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 60.8% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55% of games
7.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer