← Search

Paige McNamara

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BLOOMINGTON, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 70W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history153 matches
W
2026-10-18 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Ferguson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cymbria Jung
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-10 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Collins-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Kostogiannes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-10-10 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Collins-Bloomington · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Kostogiannes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-26 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Ferguson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-26 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Dallapiazza
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0W Tri-Level Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cymbria Jung
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
Default
2026-08-23 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 McNamara-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph McCarron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 McNamara-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Sanner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · MSIL A18&O 4.0W McNamara-Bloomington · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-12 · MSIL Mixed 18&O 7.0 McNamara-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph McCarron mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.8% of games
4.0
47.9%
23W–25L · 50.7% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 47.5% of games
7.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 38.4% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
39 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova