← Search

MacKenzie Danson

SAINT CHARLES, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
55 matches · 22W–33L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
IL · 3.5
248 of 327
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
MacKenzie is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

MacKenzie has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, MacKenzie has gone from the 42nd to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 55.4% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 31.1% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.8% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
7.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 39.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Logsdon
−0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Margaret McAndrews / Michele Kleeman
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Korreck
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 4-2
W
N/A
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicki Mitchell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Logsdon
−0.002below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Erica White / Melissa Robinson
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Seal
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-1
W
Tracy Richards / Katie Jones
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vicki Mitchell
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Shields
−0.030below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Melissa Robinson / Erica White
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Maslowski
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
W
Pauline Camacho / Laura Knapp
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shields
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
Erin van Kampen / Margaret Weiss
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Shields
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheri Medus
+0.025better than expected — took 38% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Patterson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.