← Search

Courtney Shishman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Grange, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 28W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-10-18 · NITA E 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Sorrentino
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · NITA W 70W55c Challenge-Sharp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Rippetoe-Reed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-19 · NITA W 70W55c Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Lemna
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Akers
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-16 · NITA W 65CWDb Score-Michl · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Moravek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Akers
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · NITA W 70W55c Challenge-Sharp · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Elder
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-26 · NITA W 65CWDb Score-Michl · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Lovelace
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-25 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Carney
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-11-23 · NITA E 35W40c Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesa Moskowitz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · NITA E 35W40c Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karin Carney
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · NITA E 35W40c Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Elder
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
73.3%
22W–8L · 57.7% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.3% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams