← Search

Julie Akers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hinsdale, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 38W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history66 matches
W
2026-03-22 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-25 · NITA W 35W40e Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Elder
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-03-18 · NITA W 65CWDb Score-Michl · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Moravek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-03-04 · NITA W 65CWDb Score-Michl · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Garber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-02-23 · NITA W 35W40d Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Dugan championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-11-17 · NITA E 35W40f Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-10-28 · NITA F 75CWDc Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janee Matteson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2024-09-29 · NITA E 35W40f Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Shishman
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-09-22 · NITA E 35W40f Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Sorrentino
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-09-17 · NITA F 65CWDc Score-Michl/Moskowitz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Byerly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.4% of games
3.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 23% of games
6.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.2% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe