← Search

Julie Ladewig

Tinley Park, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Julie Ladewig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-08-11 · NITA S 80W65d Park Forest-Harowski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-08-05 · NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-03 · NITA S 80W55c Park Forest-Harowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Barbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-1
W
2026-07-30 · NITA S 80W65d Park Forest-Harowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorie Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · NITA S 80W55c Park Forest-Harowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Peick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathie Melean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · NITA S 80W55c Park Forest-Harowski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverly Barbush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Christine Ripsky / Michelle Reynolds
2026-06-24 · NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelley Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · NITA S 80W55c Park Forest-Harowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Valeria Galassini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Christy Schaefer / Judy Wagner
2026-06-13 · NITA S 80W65d Park Forest-Harowski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Paun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · NITA S 75WCb Homewood-Young/Anderson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christina Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teri Ayotte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.3% of games
8.0
60%
21W–14L · 54.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova