Ana Chang
Arlington Heights, IL
327 matches · 211W–116L · seasons 2021–2027
Captains: add Ana Chang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history327 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Erica White / Michelle Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Katherine Martin / Claudia Ma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 6.Tam Lund Sat 3 $25
CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20
CHI E 40W4.0 1.Tam Lund Sun 1 $25
NITA E 40W40a Wilmette-Jurczyk/Dau
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 2Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA E 18&OW4.5 1Cent Miller Fri 7 $20
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 1.Tam Lund Tue 7 $22
CDTA S 18&OW4.5 4.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22
CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $27
CDTA S M18&O8.0 2.CPE Sitar Fri 7 $28
CDTA S TriWLo 8.Score Reece Sat 9 $20
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 4.Tam Lund Sat 3 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 5.Tam Lund Sun 1 $22
CDTA W M18&O8.0 6.CPE Sitar Fri 7:30 $28
CDTA W M40&O8.0 1.RT Lam-1 Sat 7 $27
CDTA W TriWMid 3.Gnvw Baltazaar Sat 3 $21
CHI F CW8.5 2.RCLB Cal Sat 4 $25
NITA E 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Wright
NITA S 40W18e TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W18a TAM-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 40W40b Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas
NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.1% of games
4.0
73.2%
101W–37L · 61% of games
4.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
51.6%
16W–15L · 55.5% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 69.2% of games
7.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
33W–24L · 53.3% of games
8.5mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
76 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.