Teams

NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura

2026 NITA2 Winterz Combo 18 & Over · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women

25 players · average NTRP 3.74 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesMarialin Lomongo / Claire Tramm vs Haydee Carvajal / Ashley Burk6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEileen Lee / Elise Bergman vs Nicole Borck / Lindsay Briski6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Lund / Patty Lynch vs Sheila Naylor / Brianna Keane6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-04-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesIllana Hodges / Rochelle Probst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAna Chang / Patty Lynch vs Karen Grasse / Rose Milkowski7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEileen Lee / Rochelle Probst vs Lisa Obrien / Erica White5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIllana Hodges / Elise Bergman vs Meg Griffin / Carol Yeo7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesClaudia Ma / Kaoru Oya vs Isabella Herda / Shannon Ebner1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Kajal Sangal vs KIM DOUGHERTY / Tracy Ries6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Lund / Tina Werber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKajal Sangal / Anne Ordway vs Annette Hennessy / Carrie Cook6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Courtney Robson vs Jill Lauesen / Bobbi Diedrick6-1, 6-3
2026-03-06vs NITA W 75CWc Rush Copley-StineWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Ordway / Jeanne Tromp vs Jenny Jaynes / Khankeo Khounborin6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEileen Lee / Mio Dahlquist vs Rebecca Stine / Betsy Utterback6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaoru Oya / Nancy Valerio vs Amy Karp / Veronique Doebeli Saxe7-5, 3-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAna Chang / Nancy Valerio vs Kolleen Mooren / Karen Avery4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLydia Jeon / Anne Ordway vs Suzette Stapleton / Alicia Yaeger6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEmily Lund / Tina Werber vs Isabella Herda / Christine Rusthoven6-1, 6-5
2026-02-14vs NITA W 75CWc Rush Copley-StineWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristie Jordan / Ayano Nakamura vs Sandy Peters / Veronique Doebeli Saxe6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMio Dahlquist / Anne Ordway vs Amy Karp / Karyn Michalik6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarialin Lomongo / Courtney Robson vs Rebecca Stine / Jessica Priebe6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ma / Jennifer Grady vs Haydee Carvajal / Tara Borre6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Ordway / Jeanne Tromp vs Marie Reece / Brianna Keane6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYumi Ida / Mio Dahlquist vs Cindy Monahan / Kristine Schreiner6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesAyano Nakamura / Christie Jordan vs Carolyn Humpherson / Melissa Robinson6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Mio Dahlquist vs Jennifer Peterson / Karen Grasse6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSophia Koliatsis / Jennifer Grady vs Erica White / Monica Anderson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 75CWe Wilmette-Wright/Nakamura102261024222
2NITA W 75CWf River Trails-Grasse/White84231332271
3NITA W 75CWa Hinsdale-Kamenev/Hennessy84201639301
4NITA W 75CWb Five Star-Delgrosso66181838293
5NITA W 75CWd Challenge-Keane/Reece57162042323
6NITA W 75CWg Naperville-Parse/Lamb48152144331
7NITA W 75CWc Rush Copley-Stine11182857359
8NITA W 75CWh WITHDREW Naperville-Bianchi000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Ayano Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Marialin Lomongo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Mary Therese Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Claudia Ma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.04
Ana Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Anne Ordway
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Yumi Ida
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Illana Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Sophia Koliatsis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Tina Werber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.59
Denise Lam
published 3.5
3.58
Kajal Sangal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.55
Martha Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Eileen Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Mio Dahlquist
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Emily Lund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Claire Tramm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.28
Jeanne Tromp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Elise Bergman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Nancy Valerio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Rochelle Probst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Grady
published
Patty Lynch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christie Jordan + Ayano Nakamura9077% games+23.1% vs expected
Jeanne Tromp + Ayano Nakamura5366% games+18.9% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ayano Nakamura7059% games+15.8% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Ayano Nakamura6065% games+11.5% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Eileen Lee9555% games+9.5% vs expected
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright + Denise Lam5163% games+7.6% vs expected
Mary Therese Lee + Ayano Nakamura161254% games+5.1% vs expected
Tina Werber + Emily Lund3257% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ayano Nakamura
286W–110L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Marialin Lomongo
322W–137L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Mary Therese Lee
183W–110L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.17
4
Claudia Ma
41W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
4.12
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Anne Ordway
77W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Illana Hodges
164W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Sophia Koliatsis
334W–192L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Tina Werber
131W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Denise Lam
315W–90L career · no lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Kajal Sangal
53W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Martha Davis
321W–153L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Eileen Lee
126W–112L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
3.5
Mio Dahlquist
107W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
Emily Lund
241W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Elise Bergman
70W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Nancy Valerio
69W–65L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Rochelle Probst
61W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Fra Angelica Farinas- Wright
62W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Grady
68W–54L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Lynch
28W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.