← Search

Iva Gregorova

Lindenhurst, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 67W–36L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Iva Gregorova to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
W
2026-09-12 · CHI E 40W4.0 10.MTB Meng Sat 2 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Bondoc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Sheila Bondoc championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Jennifer Koo
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheila Bondoc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
L
2026-07-07 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-2
W
2026-06-30 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-23 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 8.MTB Breger Tue 6:30 $29 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · CDTA W 40&OW4.0 12.MTB Meng Sat 2 $27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · CDTA W 18&OW4.0 10.MTB Breger Sun 4 $27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–7L · 21.5% of games
4.0
79.2%
57W–15L · 64.7% of games
4.5
25%
3W–9L · 36.7% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 61% of the time
#1 Singles
61%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams