Kim Johnson Flodin
Chicago, IL
113 matches · 35W–78L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Kim Johnson Flodin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history113 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 11.Wilm Nemec Sun 1 $20
CHI E 40W4.0 9.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $29
CHI E M18.8.0 2.Gnvw Wu Sun 5 $21
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 11Cent Nemec Sun 1 $20
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 3RT Fuller Sun 2 $27
CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA S ComboX7.5 10.RT Burks Thu 7 $27
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 1.Wlmt Nemec Sun 1 $20
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 1.RT Fuller Sun 12 $27
CDTA W ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.5
CDTA W M18&O8.0 1.Gnvw Wu Sun 5 $21
CDTA W M40&O8.0 2.RT Lam-2 Sat 7 $27
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
36.4%
28W–49L · 47.2% of games
8.5
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.