← Search

Sara Marberry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Evanston, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
251 matches · 145W–106L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history251 matches
L
2026-06-25 · CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roseann Solak
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · CDTA S M40&O8.0 1.Nbk Marberry Tue 7 $28 $28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Young Choi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · CDTA W M40&O8.0 4.Nrbk Marberry Sat 3 $28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Thornquist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Behnke
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlene Motto
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · CDTA W M40&O8.0 4.Nrbk Marberry Sat 3 $28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joon Sung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · NITA W 80W55b Schaumburg-Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlene Motto
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-01 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly O'Donnell
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-28 · CDTA W M40&O8.0 4.Nrbk Marberry Sat 3 $28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joon Sung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-24 · CDTA W 65&OW8.0 2.Naper Wiet Tue 1 $24 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Behnke
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Apple Naughton
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-11 · CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane McKillen
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
57.4%
31W–23L · 53.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
59.4%
57W–39L · 55% of games
8.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.7% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.7% of games
8.0mixed
59%
46W–32L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
60 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe