← Search

Jennifer Nemec

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 76W–188L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history264 matches
L
2026-10-11 · CHI E 18W4.0 11.Wilm Nemec Sun 1 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Johnson Flodin
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-10 · CHI E 40W4.0 9.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Castriotta
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · CHI E 40W4.0 9.RT Jasinski Sun 6 $29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Kosenkova
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-20 · CHI E 18W4.0 11.Wilm Nemec Sun 1 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antje Boeing
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Gorodiski
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-12 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Lay
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Gorodiski
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Opie
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Kulpins
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Kosenkova
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-04 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Gorodiski
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-05-21 · CDTA S 18&OW4.0 6.Wilm Nemec Thu 7 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Johnson Flodin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.4% of games
4.0
31.3%
62W–136L · 43.5% of games
4.5
10.8%
4W–33L · 27.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 56.4% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 35.4% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
62 matches
#1 Singles
10%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams