Teams

NITA S 40W40f Huntley-Willis/Korreck

2026 NITA3 Summer Adult 40 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesKym Cunningham / Laura Burns vs Lori Saguto / Debra Brambora6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMacY Morales vs Brooke Bean6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Madsen / Renee Buxton vs Cheri Medus / Jamie Thompson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnitra Willis / Jarmila Singer vs Courtney Wilkison / Lisa Barnes6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-27vs NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-CoreySplit 22
W#1 DoublesKym Cunningham / Anne Zanella-Gleason vs Suzanne Beu / Stephanie Thompson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMiriam Abe vs Teodora Varcheva6-4, 5-4
L#2 DoublesRenee Buxton / Sarah Korreck vs Erica Eisner / Lici Lytle0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAli Gerstad / Laura Burns vs Kate Newman / Julie Weidner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAnne Zanella-Gleason / Terra Jahns vs Kelly Tenuta / Catherine Wasylenko6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMacY Morales vs Dace Lilo6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Korreck / Kym Cunningham vs Mary Sullivan / Cynthia McCarthy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYuko Suzuki / Jarmila Singer vs Lori Judy / Megan Kostal6-1, 6-1
2026-06-10vs NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-LukasLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Batka / Shelley Madsen vs Alyssa Buetikofer / Jackie Smith2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMiriam Abe vs Emily Hodge6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerra Jahns / Sarah Korreck vs Karen Materick / Molly McGinnis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAli Gerstad / Jarmila Singer vs Angela Lukas / Shannon Ebner5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesLaura Burns / Anne Zanella-Gleason vs Marie Reece / Tracy Reece1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMacY Morales vs Monika Nalepa6-7, 0-3
W#2 DoublesShelley Madsen / Yuko Suzuki vs Laurie Knutte / Cindy Bielik6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesUrszula Farry / Dayna Imhoff vs Lisa Rowen / Tracy Richards2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTerra Jahns / Anne Zanella-Gleason vs Martha Davis / Jean Soh2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMacY Morales vs Haina Shin5-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesRenee Buxton / Ali Gerstad vs Silvia Kusaka / Kim Kuwabara0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesUrszula Farry / Anitra Willis vs Julie Steinberg / Leah Starkman6-3, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 40W40d Wilmette-Jurczyk/Farinas6019516159
2NITA S 40W40a Score-Knutte/Odenbeck5118616156
3NITA S 40W40c Oak Brook-Lukas42131125199
4NITA S 40W40f Huntley-Willis/Korreck33111329217
5NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey2481633219
6NITA S 40W40b Naperville-Bianchi/Tenuta1561838251
7NITA S 40W40e Vaughan-Sleezer/Medus0691532228

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
MacY Morales
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Kym Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Anne Zanella-Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Terra Jahns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Stephanie Batka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Miriam Abe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Urszula Farry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Sarah Korreck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Jarmila Singer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Yuko Suzuki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Anitra Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ali Gerstad
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Shelley Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Dayna Imhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Renee Buxton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Jessica Arnold
published
Laura Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Urszula Farry + Jarmila Singer5063% games+10.4% vs expected
Anne Zanella-Gleason + Anitra Willis9360% games+5.9% vs expected
Shelley Madsen + Yuko Suzuki5159% games+5.7% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Anne Zanella-Gleason18760% games+3.9% vs expected
Shelley Madsen + Anitra Willis11655% games+2.1% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Miriam Abe9554% games+0.3% vs expected
Anitra Willis + Urszula Farry5352% gamesnot enough data
Yuko Suzuki + MacY Morales1637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
MacY Morales
103W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Kym Cunningham
37W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Miriam Abe
64W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Urszula Farry
85W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Sarah Korreck
72W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Jarmila Singer
40W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Yuko Suzuki
111W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Anitra Willis
88W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Ali Gerstad
123W–151L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Shelley Madsen
46W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Dayna Imhoff
2W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Renee Buxton
141W–123L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Jessica Arnold
10W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Burns
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.