← Search

Tonya Schmid

Port Orchard, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
153 matches · 69W–84L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tonya Schmid to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history153 matches
W
2026-09-12 · KTAC-Schmid · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · SWW-STAC-Davis · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-06-20 · SWW-STAC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · KTAC-Schmid · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-09-19 · #2 Doubles · with Craig Schmid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2025-07-31 · Schmid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-16 · Schmid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-14 · Schmid · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-21 · STAC-Davis · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 54.9% of games
4.5
20.5%
9W–35L · 37% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
61.4%
27W–17L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
42 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams