← Search

Tonya Schmid

Port Orchard, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
151 matches · 67W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Tonya sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Tonya is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tonya has been a steady 4.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tonya has gone from the 14th to the 7th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
65.9%
27W–14L · 54.9% of games
4.5
20.5%
9W–35L · 37% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history151 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid
−0.032below expectation — took 43% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Craig Schmid
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-19 · #2 Doubles · with Craig Schmid
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
−0.014better than expected — took 100% of games against 88% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
−0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Cefe Quesada / Alana Wademixed
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sara Simonson / Sean McPheemixed
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Schmid
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Debbie Gilman / Sheryl Brown
2025-03-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cheryl Farnham
+0.038better than expected — took 38% of games against 29% expected
7-5, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.