Search

Rochelle Torgusen

Tacoma, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 44W–23L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.0
14 of 22
WA · 4.0
404 of 782

Rochelle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rochelle has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.0202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Rochelle has gone from the 84th to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 61.7% of games
4.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
+0.015better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abigail Bond
+0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Hong Vo
2026-05-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Claflin
+0.013better than expected — took 61% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Sara Simonson / Esther Kim
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
+0.055better than expected — took 63% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
+0.010better than expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Tanya Bond / Abigail Bond
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Claflin
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Riippi
0.025better than expected — took 100% of games against 92% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.