Teams

Ch.Team18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09vs Al.Crumpler18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Conley / Christy Team vs Kristi Koren / Amy Pena6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Minto / Kellie Chesson vs Heather Brewer / LeAnne Bloedon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-18vs Ju.Kim18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Dana Chapman / Adrienne Padilla6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-11vs Le.Ragsdale18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Brette Best / Mary Penn Lunger1-6, 5-7
2024-04-04vs Me.Liner/Lake18AWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristy Team / Kellie Chesson vs Susan Flanagan / Sherry Ingle6-4, 7-6
2024-03-21vs Ka.Brinckerhoff18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Karen Conley vs Jane Limkakeng / Michele Adams0-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs Su.Fanelly18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Johnson / Christy Team vs Chris Bason / Susan Fanelly3-6, 4-6
2024-03-13vs Sh.Powell18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesChristy Team / Kristin Rice vs Lisa ONeill / Jamie Martin0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Bell / Kellie Chesson vs Ginger Sluder / Leigh Magee2-6, 2-6
2024-02-29vs Ad.Brewer18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Team / Kristin Rice vs Meredith Barnette / Kris Wordsworth4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Karen Conley
published
3.49
Kristin Rice
published
3.42
Christy Team
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.33
Beth Rives
published 3.5
3.15
Cara Kuremsky
published 3.5
3.08
Kellie Chesson
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kary Hemingway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Team + Kellie Chesson422159% games+6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Hartinger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Conley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kristin Rice
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Christy Team
150W–90L career · 8 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Beth Rives
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cara Kuremsky
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kellie Chesson
107W–119L career · 12 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Kary Hemingway
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.