Teams

Love To Play

2025 55&Over Women · 6.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-19vs Nice AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesNorma Stojanovski / Margot Meahan vs Theresa Turner / Marytheresa Littlefield6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLulu Ablan / Jill Schulz vs Debra Schoengood / Madeline Devito7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLoreen Torrone / Lisa Reale vs Debra Cwiek / Pamela Desilvestri6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-12vs Nice AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRosemarie Federico / Jennifer Martin vs Susan Harrison / Beth Witte2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDarleen Fiorelli / Kathleen Wallace vs Michele Friedman / Mary Ricardo1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Guglielmo / Lulu Ablan vs June Rizzo / Rebecca Lupo6-1, 6-0
2025-03-05vs Nice AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesLulu Ablan / Anna Yrad vs Theresa Turner / Marytheresa Littlefield6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDarleen Fiorelli / Tracy Guglielmo vs Michele Friedman / Jill Pincus3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLoreen Torrone / Susan Connery vs Debra Schoengood / Marguerite Portagallo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-26vs Nice AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Schulz / Lucia Marchetta vs Jill Pincus / Beth Witte6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNorma Stojanovski / Sema Akin vs Kim Paris / Michele Friedman6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Fabisak / Marisol Young vs Lori Littenberg / Andrea Block6-1, 6-1
2025-02-19vs Nice AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosemarie Federico / Jennifer Martin vs Laurie Goldzweig / Theresa Turner7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarleen Fiorelli / Joann Mangarelli vs Madeline Devito / Marytheresa Littlefield3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGerilyn Mahlof / Anna Yrad vs Debra Schoengood / Janet Applebaum6-4, 6-1
2025-02-12vs Nice AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelanie Neubelt / Sema Akin vs Theresa Turner / Marytheresa Littlefield6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarisol Young / Norma Stojanovski vs Marguerite Portagallo / Jill Pincus6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLoreen Torrone / Lisa Reale vs Andrea Block / Rebecca Lupo6-3, 6-4
2025-02-05vs Nice AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Donohue / Kim Keane vs Marguerite Portagallo / Theresa Turner7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSema Akin / Kathleen Wallace vs Madeline Devito / June Rizzo6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoann Mangarelli / Sue Fabisak vs Janet Applebaum / Pamela Desilvestri6-4, 6-0
2025-01-29vs Nice AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargot Meahan / Gerilyn Mahlof vs Theresa Turner / Marytheresa Littlefield1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSue Fabisak / Lucia Marchetta vs Beth Witte / Susan Harrison2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLoreen Torrone / Lisa Reale vs Debra Cwiek / Lori Littenberg6-2, 6-0
2025-01-22vs Nice AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargot Meahan / Marisol Young vs Laurie Goldzweig / Mary Ricardo6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLucia Marchetta / Jill Schulz vs Susan Harrison / Marguerite Portagallo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Martin / Rosemarie Federico vs Margaret Jones / Kim Paris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-15vs Nice AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Donohue / Kim Keane vs Marguerite Portagallo / Kim Paris2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Neubelt / Joann Mangarelli vs Beth Witte / Jill Pincus7-5, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLoreen Torrone / Susan Connery vs Madeline Devito / June Rizzo6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love To Play010201029252
2Nice Aces010102043298

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Lisa Reale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Margot Meahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Susan Connery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Melanie Neubelt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Sema Akin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Lucia Marchetta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Tracy Guglielmo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Anna Yrad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Kim Keane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lulu Ablan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Norma Stojanovski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Jill Schulz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Marisol Young
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Sue Fabisak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Dana Donohue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Joann Mangarelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Gerilyn Mahlof
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Darleen Fiorelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Loreen Torrone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Wallace
published
Rosemarie Federico
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerilyn Mahlof + Melanie Neubelt5258% games+17.1% vs expected
Melanie Neubelt + Joann Mangarelli6160% games+9.6% vs expected
Sue Fabisak + Jill Schulz13554% games+5.4% vs expected
Marisol Young + Margot Meahan451559% games+4.5% vs expected
Lucia Marchetta + Sema Akin7255% games+3.7% vs expected
Lisa Reale + Susan Connery10850% games+2.8% vs expected
Marisol Young + Joann Mangarelli3453% games+1.5% vs expected
Tracy Guglielmo + Darleen Fiorelli31042% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Reale
49W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Margot Meahan
113W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Susan Connery
30W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Melanie Neubelt
95W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Sema Akin
54W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Lucia Marchetta
101W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Tracy Guglielmo
39W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Anna Yrad
53W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Kim Keane
26W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Lulu Ablan
80W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Norma Stojanovski
33W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Jill Schulz
104W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Marisol Young
129W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Sue Fabisak
88W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Dana Donohue
32W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.67
Joann Mangarelli
56W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Gerilyn Mahlof
66W–82L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Darleen Fiorelli
16W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Loreen Torrone
24W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
Kathleen Wallace
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosemarie Federico
39W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.