Teams

Worsley/18/5.5/NOLTC

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day

17 players · average NTRP 2.79 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-09-01vs Barrington/18+/5.5/CPLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlicia Higginbotham / Christina Fritchie vs Sydnie Cole / Lindsay Yenni3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Webb / Caroline Young vs Amy Perry / Amelia Hurt3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Henry / Kirsten Breckinridge vs Alana Chester / Amanda Swift2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 5.5 NO (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kazik/18+/5.5/GACC000000
2Impastato/18/5.5/MCC000000
3Spansel /18+/5.5/CP000000
4Barrington/18+/5.5/CP000000
5Worsley/18/5.5/NOLTC000000
6Dunn/18+/5.5/NOCC000000
7Ackerman/18+/5.5/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Samantha Stokes
published
2.75
Lucy Browne
published
Amy Rougelot
published 3
Charlotte Henry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Danielle LeSueur
published 3
2.56
Jennifer Kitner
published
2.50
Ashley Kostmayer
published 3
2.49
2.46
Kirsten Breckinridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Sarah Worsley
published
2.40
Katie Miles
published
2.39
Lacy Edgecombe
published
Christina Fritchie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Eileen Devall
published 2.5
2.22
Caroline Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Laurel Roberts
published
Megan Knapp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Kitner + Kirsten Breckinridge123 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Stokes + Laurel Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Stokes
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Lucy Browne
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Rougelot
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Charlotte Henry
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Danielle LeSueur
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Kitner
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.56
3
Ashley Kostmayer
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jessica King-Bernard
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kirsten Breckinridge
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Sarah Worsley
24W–24L career · no lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
Katie Miles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Lacy Edgecombe
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
2.5
Christina Fritchie
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Eileen Devall
11W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Caroline Young
2W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Laurel Roberts
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Megan Knapp
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.