Teams

SGV Newhall Tigers-Newhall-Live Oaks/SU1

2025 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-23vs SGV LLW sgveez-Stansbury-WN/SU2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Newhall / Blair Slattery vs David Castillo / Adrian Tay1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSean Manion vs Ky Vo3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYing Du / Victor Ho vs William Hathaway / Jermaine Montgomery5-7, 5-7
2025-03-16vs SGV LLW sgveez-Stansbury-WN/SU2Split 11
L#1 DoublesGabriel Fitch / Hugh Allen vs Adrian Tay / Raul Saavedra4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSean Manion / Brian Newhall vs Alex Nassif / Michael Tschebaum6-4, 6-4
2025-03-02vs SGV LLW sgveez-Stansbury-WN/SU2Split 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Howard / Sean Manion vs Michael Tschebaum / Alex Nassif6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGabriel Fitch / Brian Newhall vs Raul Saavedra / Adrian Tay6-2, 6-4
2025-02-09vs SGV LLW sgveez-Stansbury-WN/SU2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesGreg Howard / Gabriel Fitch vs Jesse Wallis / William Hathaway3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGeorge Cheung / Brian Newhall vs Ky Vo / Michael Pang5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesYing Du / Victor Ho vs Alex Nassif / Michael Tschebaum2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blair Slattery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Brian Newhall
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.88
Mark Messana
published
3.65
Daniel Kanemoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Hugh Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
William Ko
published
Gabriel Fitch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Greg Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Frazier
published
Sean Manion
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Victor Ho
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wade Metzler
published
Ying Du
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Blair Slattery
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brian Newhall
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
Mark Messana
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.88
4
Daniel Kanemoto
22W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Hugh Allen
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
William Ko
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Gabriel Fitch
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Howard
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Frazier
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Manion
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Ho
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wade Metzler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ying Du
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.