← Teams

MPRC-Monsantofils

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Donald Pettitt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
John Major
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Floyd Grant
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.40
Tom Byrne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Tim Brink
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Gates
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Rick Wong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Edwin Becker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2022-09-17Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesEdwin Becker / Perry Sides vs David Whiteside / Glen Satre6-0, 6-3
2022-09-16Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Jeffrey Nomi / Wilbert Look7-6, 6-1
2022-09-15Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTed Carlson / Edwin Becker vs Tom Wimberly / Greg Everson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Michael Rollyson / Davis Wightman3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-11-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Eric Cooley vs Murray Jansen / Doug Matheson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Chuck Yett / Steven Keo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Paul Stutzman / Matt Bolte6-3, 6-3
2021-10-30Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesJim Borell / Tom Byrne vs Carlin Jackson / Tom Lonergan6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Craig Mills / Lance Berkey6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRick Wong / John Major vs John Hall / William Hergenhan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs James Ringelberg / Thomas Turnbull6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdwin Becker / Gary Willihnganz vs David White / Zachary Wright7-5, 6-2
2021-10-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesGary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates vs Ken Nichols / Steve Eggerts6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Terence Gariety / David Dowler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Joel Ankeny / Gary Chin1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-02Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesRick Wong / Edwin Becker vs David Carlson / Vincent Robertson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTom Byrne / Jim Borell vs Bruce Yang / Jim Wheeler5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Brink / Perry Sides vs Kelly Small / Len Morales1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-25Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesJohn Major / Rick Wong vs Peter Schulte / Peter Cutrona6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Edwin Becker vs Michael Kazangian / John Wallin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-10Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRick Wong / John Major vs William Anderson / Chris Eddy6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesFloyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils vs Alex Pulaski / Bill Rhoades6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonald Pettitt / Edwin Becker vs Mark Stephenson / Mike Mullen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Donald Pettitt
43W–50L career
3%96%0%
3.72
4
John Major
9W–20L career
15%83%2%
3.67
4
Floyd Grant
44W–32L career
15%85%0%
3.64
3.5
Tom Byrne
4W–4L career · type S
2%81%18%
3.40
3.5
Tim Brink
43W–26L career · type A
3%85%12%
3.35
3.5
Jeffrey Gates
102W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3.5
Rick Wong
51W–50L career
1%97%2%
3.30
3.5
Edwin Becker
15W–22L career
2%97%1%
3.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.