Teams

SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ Stacy

2024 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE · SD - Women - 3.0 WE

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Sahd / Lisa Carey vs Candace Gyure / Megumi Bolger6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Sahd / Katie Herrick vs Cindy Chu / Dianne Golingan4-6
2024-02-18vs SD 3.0 Rancho Penasquitos TC/ NgWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatie Herrick / Karen Sahd vs Terri Oates / Carolyn Shea6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElayne Berman vs Khanh Nguyen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Ruth Hoffman vs Katherine Ng / Sheryl Nelson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElayne Berman vs Candace Gyure6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Sahd / Katie Herrick vs Cathy Edwards / Carrie Ridge6-2, 6-0
2024-02-04vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrittney Emerson / Karen Sahd vs Hillary Kleiner / Melinda Meader3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-28vs SD 3.0 Rancho Penasquitos TC/ NgWon 20
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Stewart / Karen Sahd vs Heather Riley / Terri Oates6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElayne Berman vs Khanh Nguyen6-4, 7-6
2024-01-14vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ KleinerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Axmann / Carol Gamara vs Michelle Adams / Elyse Wurster3-6, 3-6
2024-01-07vs SD 3.0 Rancho Penasquitos TC/ NgSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Sahd / Jo Ann Stewart vs Carolyn Shea / Heather Riley6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesElayne Berman vs Sheila Birtsas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Leslie Hazard
published 3.5
3.35
Lisa Carey
published
3.26
Katie Herrick
published
3.26
Brittney Emerson
published 3
3.23
Karen Sahd
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.10
Shirley Park
published
3.06
Jo Ann Stewart
published
2.71
Elayne Berman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Laura Stacy
published
2.63
Karen Axmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ruth Hoffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elayne Berman + Karen Axmann2434% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leslie Hazard
72W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Lisa Carey
25W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Katie Herrick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Brittney Emerson
26W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.26
3.5
Karen Sahd
52W–66L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Shirley Park
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Jo Ann Stewart
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Elayne Berman
70W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Karen Axmann
46W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
Ruth Hoffman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.