Teams

THPRD-Soiffer

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Patrick Harkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Patrick Maginnis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Donna Kennish
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Danny Denning
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.40
Maria Kosmetatos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Deanna Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Michael Sheridan
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-06-07Won 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Kennish / Neil Soiffer vs Frank Collie / Alison Davis7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJulie Hansen / Danny Denning vs Colleen Stroeder / Randolph Splitter3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Sheridan / Arlene Doughty vs Judith Kobin / Alan Montrose7-5, 7-5
2019-06-01Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Maria Kosmetatos vs Joseph Collins / Sandy Garry6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDanny Denning / Julie Hansen vs Patrick Trank / Lorrie Brawner6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRick Karlin / Deanna Peterson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-05-31Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Arlene Doughty vs Jack Henry / Kim Stevens7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Maginnis / Maria Kosmetatos vs Harold Rohrbach / Peggy Jaques6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Sheridan / Donna Kennish vs Donald Brenneman / Marie Reykalin7-6, 6-2
2019-05-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesDonna Kennish / Patrick Maginnis vs Lisa Provost / Everett Frank6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Julie Hansen vs Carol Chiu / Jim Hopkins5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2019-05-04Won 30
W#1 DoublesMaria Kosmetatos / Patrick Harkin vs Craig Koessler / Patricia Sturr6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDonna Kennish / Patrick Maginnis vs Tom Lonergan / Terrina Gonzalez6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Rebecca Redding / DuplicateErasmo DuplicateGonzalez6-2, 6-1
2019-04-20Won 30
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Yumiko Pike / Lynn Marzette6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatrick Maginnis / Maria Kosmetatos vs Jeff Gulley / Diana Almy6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Sheridan / Julie Hansen vs Jim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik7-6, 7-5
2019-04-14Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Flor Harrigan vs Tony Khamsouk / Amiee Moyers6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Donna Kennish vs Jim Wheeler / Liz DelPlato6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanny Denning / Julie Hansen vs Robert Ferek / Marje Ferek6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2019-04-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Flor Harrigan vs Mary Sides / Perry Sides6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Hansen / Danny Denning vs Patricia Brink / Seth Uram6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
4
Patrick Maginnis
112W–54L career
14%86%0%
3.59
4
Donna Kennish
137W–120L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Danny Denning
64W–77L career
37%63%0%
3.48
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Maria Kosmetatos
54W–65L career
0%93%7%
3.40
0
Deanna Peterson
9W–22L career
not enough data
0
Michael Sheridan
37W–37L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.