Teams

MI-Aces Up-Chang

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs NWW-HBSQ-RedaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Bryn Peterson vs Forrest Reda / David Eckols5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLee Slaughter vs Kevin Mcdonald0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Brick / Shaz Qadeer vs Sean Diven / Kumar Bhat3-6, 3-6
2026-03-08vs ETC-Box2 2.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Chad Rowe vs Rush Velcsov / Harish Mallidi2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesOliver Chang vs Andrea Fabrizi3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBryn Peterson / David Vavrichek vs Thomas Resing / Venkat Mahalingam6-2, 6-1
2026-02-28vs FC-Basha Tennis 2.5MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Oliver Chang vs Matt Papes / Van Ly6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShaz Qadeer vs Upen Kattla4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Vavrichek / Michael Brick vs John Fong / Todd Reifsteck5-7, 5-7
2026-02-13vs NWW-HBSQ-RedaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Aaron Hinojosa vs Sean Diven / Richard Gould6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesOliver Chang vs Forrest Reda6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShaz Qadeer / Bryn Peterson vs Kevin Mcdonald / Tom Lash4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-08vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 01
L#1 DoublesOliver Chang / Jeffrey Wenzel vs Mehrdad Mozafari / Louis Cheng4-6, 6-7
2026-01-24vs FC-Basha Tennis 2.5MWon 21
W#1 DoublesShaz Qadeer / Lee Slaughter vs Todd Reifsteck / Will Crafton6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesOliver Chang vs Van Ly7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBryn Peterson / Robert Peha vs Matt Papes / Suhas Pinnamaneni5-7, 4-6
2026-01-23vs MC-2.5M-MuthuLost 03
L#1 DoublesOliver Chang / Jeffrey Wenzel vs Senthil Kumar Muthu / Aditya Choudhary0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLee Slaughter vs Forrest Yu5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Peha / Bryn Peterson vs Travis Glover / Suresh Siricilla1-6, 1-6
2026-01-10vs HBSQ-RichLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Wenzel / Lee Slaughter vs Joseph Carter / Eugene Besel7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesOliver Chang vs Aaron Young2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Brick / David Vavrichek vs Michael Kosten / Daryl Okamura3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Robert Peha
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jeffrey Wenzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.46
Shaz Qadeer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Oliver Chang
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.36
Lee Slaughter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Aaron Hinojosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Chad Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
David Vavrichek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Michael Brick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Bryn Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Oliver Chang + Jeffrey Wenzel7456% games+6.3% vs expected
Bryn Peterson + Jeffrey Wenzel3743% games+3.9% vs expected
Michael Brick + David Vavrichek033 matchesnot enough data
Bryn Peterson + David Vavrichek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Peha
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.36
2.5
Jeffrey Wenzel
26W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Shaz Qadeer
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Oliver Chang
29W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Lee Slaughter
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Aaron Hinojosa
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Chad Rowe
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
David Vavrichek
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Michael Brick
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Bryn Peterson
12W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.