Teams

Team 4 Aim Set Smash!

2025 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-27vs Team 3 Forever YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawn Dalton / Mary Crespy vs Bernadette Donofrio / Joan-Marie Turchiano4-6, 5-2
2025-06-24vs Team 6 Net Force DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathryn Welsh / Jo Ann Moore vs Beth Hill / Linda Krout6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDe Ann Boehm / Ann Storck vs Cynthia Robinson / Lauren Rowley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Ellen Giuseppe / Debra Pickus vs Alice Edmondson / Carol Chapin4-6, 3-4
2025-06-18vs Team 1 AARP All-StarsWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictoria Huttar / Mary Ellen Giuseppe vs Carisa Dueweke / Karen Gettier6-2, 6-4
2025-06-05vs Team 3 Forever YoungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Crespy / Karen Hanna vs Donna Lee / Joan-Marie Turchiano6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesVictoria Huttar / Elizabeth Law vs Mary Aaron / Kate Putt4-6, 4-5
2025-05-30vs Team 6 Net Force DayWon 10
W#3 DoublesVictoria Huttar / Constance Seid vs Alice Edmondson / Carol Chapin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs Team 1 AARP All-StarsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Crespy / Shawn Dalton vs Phyllis Corley / Carisa Dueweke6-4, 6-2
2025-05-16vs Team 2 Strings AttachedWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Crespy / Shawn Dalton vs Ashley Whitner / LOUISA WOODVILLE6-4, 6-0
2025-05-12vs Team 5 Kissals MissillesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Burke Fox / Mary Crespy vs Lori Huthoefer / Nancy Waxer6-4, 1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mary Crespy
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Bethany Wagner
published 3.5
3.30
Ann Storck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Pickus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
De Ann Boehm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kathryn Welsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Victoria Huttar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Mary Burke Fox
published
3.20
Jo Ann Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Constance Seid
published 3.5
3.15
Shawn Dalton
published
3.01
Elizabeth Law
published
Karen Hanna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Welsh + Jo Ann Moore314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Hanna + Jo Ann Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Crespy + Bethany Wagner303 matchesnot enough data
De Ann Boehm + Bethany Wagner213 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Dalton + Victoria Huttar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Crespy
111W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Bethany Wagner
8W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Ann Storck
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Debra Pickus
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
De Ann Boehm
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kathryn Welsh
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Victoria Huttar
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Mary Burke Fox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jo Ann Moore
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Constance Seid
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Shawn Dalton
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Law
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Karen Hanna
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.