Teams

LEBTC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs SS-H BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Adriana Vernon / Sesha Carbonaro4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Andrea Tuomi6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristine Maleri / Denise Larsen vs Lee Silver / Marty Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelli Murphy / Hanne Schauer vs Kiersten Paul / Inge Bentz6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-08vs KC-CC YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Phillips / Rebecca Duque vs Stephanie Wiesing / Beth Day3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Kristin Kottcamp6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKristine Maleri / Denise Larsen vs Karla Elliot / Lenora Louie Phelps6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHanne Schauer / Lisa McGavern vs Cara Owen / Anita Burns6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-01vs HFII GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs DNita Andrews / Stacy Ford3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Kristi Piazza / Rene Meale5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristine Maleri / Kelli Murphy vs Amy Kinney / Anna Carmody7-5, 6-2
2025-06-24vs WC NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesRebecca Duque / Carla Gamet vs Jamelle Leyden / Melissa Klein7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Robin Carroll7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Kate Mayoss / Heather Hines7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristine Maleri / Hanne Schauer vs Doreen Rogers / Andrea Milanovich6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs LTFC ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesCarla Gamet / Hanne Schauer vs Leslie DeVilliers / Kaori Dowling1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Meghan Balderston6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRebecca Duque / Kelli Murphy vs Sviatlana Yasianovich / Victoria Burgess4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Kelly Lessman vs Heidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-06-16vs HRCA-N BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Michelle Millet / Debbie Lew4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristine Maleri vs Katie Frisch3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHanne Schauer / Elaine Gailloux vs Monica Greenfield / Corinne Flemister2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa McGavern / Denise Larsen vs Ann Olson / Gena Erwin0-6, 2-6
2025-06-10vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesChristie Bianco / Sarah Phillips vs Courtney Carignan / Valerie Koenig0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesElaine Gailloux vs Celine DAmore1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Maleri / Kelli Murphy vs Shari Newton / Elenita Marsan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarla Gamet / Denise Larsen vs Lisa Mullett / Jordana Sutphin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Elaine Gailloux
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.81
Rebecca Duque
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Carla Gamet
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.76
Kristine Maleri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Denise Larsen
published 4
3.68
Christie Bianco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Kelli Murphy
published
3.57
Kelly Lessman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Hanne Schauer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.37
Lisa McGavern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa McGavern + Kelli Murphy3346% games+1.9% vs expected
Rebecca Duque + Carla Gamet472853% games−0.4% vs expected
Kelly Lessman + Lisa McGavern132445% games−1.3% vs expected
Denise Larsen + Rebecca Duque11553% games−1.9% vs expected
Kristine Maleri + Rebecca Duque1445% games−3.3% vs expected
Kristine Maleri + Denise Larsen3547% games−4.1% vs expected
Christie Bianco + Lisa McGavern1740% games−5.8% vs expected
Hanne Schauer + Kelli Murphy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elaine Gailloux
88W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Rebecca Duque
132W–117L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Carla Gamet
127W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kristine Maleri
59W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Denise Larsen
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christie Bianco
26W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Kelli Murphy
18W–33L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Kelly Lessman
24W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Hanne Schauer
31W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Lisa McGavern
67W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.