Teams

Namie/55s/6.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.36 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Allyson Davis
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
Donna Mott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Denise Weed
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.99
Berrill Vogt
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.91
Cathy West
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.85
Carole Dahmer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jamie Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jan Greer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Karie Tillman
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Kathy Farrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Ricotta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Hewitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sheila Wittie
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Suzie Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tessy Ajubita
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Yvette O'Krepki
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Greer + Yvette O'Krepki3249% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Hewitt + Cathy West1437% gamesnot enough data
Tessy Ajubita + Berrill Vogt134 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Nancy Hewitt134 matchesnot enough data
Suzie Lambert + Cathy West224 matchesnot enough data
Carole Dahmer + Denise Weed033 matchesnot enough data
Cathy West + Allyson Davis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allyson Davis
24W–11L career · 13 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Donna Mott
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Denise Weed
2W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Berrill Vogt
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cathy West
41W–27L career · 36 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3.5
Carole Dahmer
2W–16L career · 15 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Jamie Hill
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jan Greer
6W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karie Tillman
10W–24L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Farrow
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Ricotta
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Hewitt
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sheila Wittie
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzie Lambert
27W–18L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tessy Ajubita
1W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvette O'Krepki
4W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.