Teams

TSherburne

2022 Cap Spring USTA 40 & over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-11vs IFAllisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Holscher / Morgan Camp vs John Dunn / Scott Cruikshank3-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesTed Sherburne / Scott St John vs David Boyce / Randy Richardson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDarin Meyer / Robert Weaver vs Frank Allison / Tim Lyon6-1, 6-4
2022-05-10vs JBRUCKEL 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesTed Sherburne / Mike Hennen vs John Bruckel / OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara6-1, 6-2
2022-04-20vs AOLIVER_40Split 11
L#1 DoublesTed Sherburne / Paul Holscher vs John Parsons / Jim Starling4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMike Hennen / Morgan Camp vs Gerard Auvergne / Brian Soltz6-3, 6-1
2022-04-06vs ITMorrowLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Holscher / Ted Sherburne vs Christopher Siege / Craig Collard6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDarin Meyer / Robert Weaver vs Tom Morrow / Bryan Simpson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScott St John / Morgan Camp vs David Anderson / Paul Wiegand6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-30vs LBrockWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Holscher / Ted Sherburne vs Graham Schillmoller / W Troutman6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMorgan Camp / Mike Hennen vs Blake Paro / Andrew Tate7-6, 6-3
2022-03-25vs IFAllisonWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Holscher / Ted Sherburne vs John Dunn / Randy Richardson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMorgan Camp / Wilson Crow vs Frank Allison / Larry Essary7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott St John / Darin Meyer vs Farr Curlin / David Boyce7-6, 6-4
2022-03-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesTed Sherburne / Paul Holscher vs Adam Thompson / Joseph Forbes6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Seb Heese
published
3.84
Morgan Camp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Darin Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Ted Sherburne
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.70
Bryan Barker
published 4
3.69
Scott St John
published
3.69
Mike Hennen
published
3.66
Penn Holderness
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Camp + Ted Sherburne12854% games−5.7% vs expected
Darin Meyer + Scott St John123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seb Heese
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Morgan Camp
117W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Darin Meyer
60W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ted Sherburne
148W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bryan Barker
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Scott St John
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Mike Hennen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Penn Holderness
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.