Teams

Cox/META

2025 Adult 40 & Over-META · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Soma Mukherjee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Holli Cox
published
3.19
Ju Mo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Sarah LaGuardia
published
3.16
Lynne Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Dana Wenzell
published 3.5
3.10
Jane Dean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Holly Grammer
published
2.95
Jan Goodsell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Kirsten Hoskins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.56
Aileen Frazier
published 3
Laura Reeves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Dean + Kirsten Hoskins5447% games−8.0% vs expected
Lynne Little + Sarah LaGuardia224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah LaGuardia + Holly Grammer134 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Little + Jane Dean303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Soma Mukherjee
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Holli Cox
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Ju Mo
24W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Sarah LaGuardia
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Lynne Little
31W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Dana Wenzell
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Jane Dean
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Holly Grammer
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Jan Goodsell
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Kirsten Hoskins
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Aileen Frazier
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
2.56
Laura Reeves
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.