Teams

White-Ward3-LC

2022 Lake Charles Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 LC (18&O) Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 LC (18&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Patti Ward
published
2.95
Bridget Vita
published 3
Andrea White
published 3
Beau James Faul
published 3
2.64
Maria Faul
published
Matthew Fontenot
published
Maureen Fontenot
published
Tyler Daigle
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patti Ward
27W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.54
3
Bridget Vita
23W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Andrea White
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Beau James Faul
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Dominique Noel Chaisson
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maria Faul
14W–30L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Matthew Fontenot
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Fontenot
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler Daigle
1W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.