Teams

Belmont Kelly 9.5

2025 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 9.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-08vs Belmont Bader 9.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesLogan Glen / Konstantin Dombrovskiy vs Nevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-02vs Belmont Bader 9.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Logan Glen vs Jeremy New / Nevena Arsic1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-01vs Belmont Bader 9.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Elizabeth Kelly vs Jeremy New / Erin Waters3-6, 5-7
2025-10-25vs Belmont Bader 9.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Logan Glen vs Nevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati2-6, 4-6
2025-10-05vs Belmont Bader 9.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Laura Lafors vs Joanna Pfluger / Naveen Chennupati6-7, 3-6
2025-10-04vs Belmont Bader 9.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKonstantin Dombrovskiy / Laura Lafors vs Diego Alejandro Parada / Lindsay Bazydlo1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.81
Alicia Rowley
published 5
4.67
Nellina Wooten
published
4.66
Ashley Schmitz
published 5
4.56
Joseph Brown
published
4.42
Konstantin Dombrovskiy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.40
Kevin Long
published
4.39
Nicole Parker
published
4.29
Laura Lafors
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
4.16
Ryan Baker
published
4.14
Wayne Motley
published
4.12
Dale Nowery
published 4.5
3.97
Logan Glen
published
3.87
Ryan Berry
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Alicia Rowley
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
Nellina Wooten
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Ashley Schmitz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.66
Joseph Brown
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.56
5
Konstantin Dombrovskiy
71W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
Kevin Long
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
Nicole Parker
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Laura Lafors
158W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Ryan Baker
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Wayne Motley
9W–20L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Dale Nowery
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
Logan Glen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Ryan Berry
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.