Teams

Nelson/Palena

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Heidi Palena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Ericka Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Ericka Nelson vs Kealani Mead-Forton / Valerie Neill7-5, 6-4
2023-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Ericka Nelson vs Julia Henry / Jane Paulsen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Valerie Regan3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Ericka Nelson vs Maya Mori / Tiffany Bowie6-2, 6-4
2023-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Carolyn Graeper / Jennifer Pultz6-0, 6-2
2023-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Shawn Sefchick / Joanna Asia Wagner4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Palena / Ericka Nelson vs Emily Shue / Samantha Damiano4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesEricka Nelson / Heidi Palena vs Christina Parks / Deborah Self6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heidi Palena
79W–62L career
4%96%0%
3.19
3.5
Ericka Nelson
43W–59L career
17%83%0%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.