Teams

UPTA75A/Walker/Cardinal

75 & Over · 75 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-12vs LCTA75/Sawyer/CTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Buzby / Lynda Kinsey vs Lessie Snead / Charlene Willis7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGinny Milks / Nancy Goodroe vs Penny Portman / Susan Mock3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBobbie Cancelliere / Pamela Herron vs Andrea Weinstein / Kay Sawyer6-1, 6-2
2025-10-12vs HHTL75/Ball/CCHHWon 21
W#1 DoublesKay Buzby / Lynda Kinsey vs Bonnie Hackworth / Lois McKinley7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGinny Milks / Nancy Goodroe vs Roberta Carey / Patricia Howes4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBobbie Cancelliere / Pamela Herron vs Dorothy Fein / Cristy Robertson6-1, 6-2
2025-10-10vs HHTL75/Ball/CCHHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Elrod / Ginny Milks vs Bonnie Hackworth / Lois McKinley2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKay Buzby / Lynda Kinsey vs Dorothy Fein / Cristy Robertson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 75 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Pamela Herron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Bobbie Cancelliere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Lynda Kinsey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ginny Milks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Henrietta Walker
published
Judy Elrod
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kay Buzby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Goodroe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shelby Pierson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Herron + Bobbie Cancelliere3258% games+1.8% vs expected
Bobbie Cancelliere + Henrietta Walker4557% games−3.3% vs expected
Kay Buzby + Lynda Kinsey404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Herron
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Bobbie Cancelliere
9W–13L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Lynda Kinsey
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Ginny Milks
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Henrietta Walker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Elrod
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kay Buzby
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Goodroe
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Pierson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.