Teams

Ivory Ridge-Mullins

2024 UTA 2.5 Summer League · 2.5 AM

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-05vs Wasatch Rec Center-KellyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Mullins / Paulette Santiago vs Suly Cates / Chelsie Otteson7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristy Denney vs Rachel Kahler1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCara Larson / Risa Karras vs Lisa Candland / Alyson Kelly6-1, 6-1
2024-07-29vs Sunpro-Dunn/CookLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaulette Santiago / Christy Denney vs MaryBeth Robertson / Jen White4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Mullins vs Michelle Frandsen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTravis Treat / Cara Larson vs Emily Hill / Rachelle Lee1-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs Wasatch Hills-Iverson/DoolinLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Mullins / Cara Larson vs Jennifer Olson / Tiffany VandenAkker4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPaulette Santiago vs Brooke Iverson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiana Lacey / Risa Karras vs Katie Murphy / Nicholl Doolin6-7, 4-6
2024-07-22vs Park City MARC-Llewellyn/WhiteLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Mullins / Deborah DeBoer vs Bridget Llewellyn / Margaret Bloomer3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Lacey vs Janet White4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShea McGee / Risa Karras vs Kim Li / Megan Johnstone3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-15vs Red Ledges-EganWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristy Denney / Shea McGee vs Michelle Stauffer / Britta Davis7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTravis Treat vs McCall Weekes3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Mullins / Diana Lacey vs Jennifer Christ / Morgan Adams6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-01vs Salt Lake Tennis-FriedliWon 20
W#1 DoublesRisa Karras / Christy Denney vs Kristin Midyett / Sarah McMillan2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTravis Treat / Diana Lacey vs Candy Friedli / Olivia Moreton6-3, 6-2
2024-06-24vs Park City MARC-Jacobs/JordanLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaulette Santiago / Deborah DeBoer vs Lynette Maloney / Stacey Christrensen1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCara Larson vs Shruthi Kinkead1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Denney / Diana Lacey vs Bethany Jordan / Sheri Jacobs6-0, 7-5
2024-06-17vs Cottonwood Club-BarberLost 12
L#1 DoublesRisa Karras / Travis Treat vs Tam Pham / Mary Diaz Gordon0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShea McGee vs Jane Woolley2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Mullins / Paulette Santiago vs Alison Barber / Kylee Bryson6-3, 6-3
2024-06-10vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristy Denney / Paulette Santiago vs Megan Moore / Melanie Olsen2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDeborah DeBoer vs Lindsay Roth6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesShea McGee / Cara Larson vs Crystal Bell / Kimberly Flamm6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2.5 AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro-Dunn/Cook9023410151
2Cottonwood Club-Barber8119818183
3Salt Lake Tennis-Friedli54121533242
4Park City MARC-Llewellyn/White54131434270
5Wasatch Rec Center-Kelly45141326203
6Ivory Ridge-Mullins45131432244
7Wasatch Hills-Iverson/Doolin45101734239
8Park City MARC-Jacobs/Jordan36121533232
9Sports Mall-Nelson36111633223
10Red Ledges-Egan0981943283

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Diana Lacey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.74
Paulette Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
Risa Karras
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Megan Mullins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Christy Denney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Deborah DeBoer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Cara Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Shea McGee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Travis Treat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Risa Karras + Cara Larson3256% games+11.5% vs expected
Christy Denney + Diana Lacey8363% games+10.1% vs expected
Risa Karras + Diana Lacey8362% games+6.3% vs expected
Deborah DeBoer + Megan Mullins4165% games+4.6% vs expected
Megan Mullins + Paulette Santiago12951% games+0.4% vs expected
Cara Larson + Paulette Santiago1635% games−6.6% vs expected
Risa Karras + Christy Denney6645% games−9.4% vs expected
Megan Mullins + Shea McGee2443% games−16.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diana Lacey
41W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Paulette Santiago
60W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Risa Karras
49W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
2.74
Megan Mullins
44W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Christy Denney
50W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
2.5
Deborah DeBoer
33W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cara Larson
35W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
Shea McGee
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Travis Treat
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.