Teams

WNCR Melnyk (HRC)

Adult 65 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 65+ Adult Men 3.5 Tues

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-04-16vs WNCS King (Peachtree)Won 21
L#1 DoublesBob Harris / Eddie Johnson vs Bradford Deudne / James Janda5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGerard Bourgeois / Charles Thomas vs Stephen King / Matthew Lampe7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCOY WINN / Eddie Carpenter vs ALAN SERES / Ken Willard6-4, 6-3
2026-04-14vs WNCS King (Peachtree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEddie Johnson / Bob Harris vs ALAN SERES / Matthew Lampe7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobert Melnyk / James Williams vs Bradford Deudne / James Janda1-6, 0-4
W#3 DoublesCharles Brock / Charles Thomas vs Gordon High / Ken Willard7-6, 6-1
2026-04-07vs WNCS King (Peachtree)Won 21
L#1 DoublesEddie Johnson / Bob Harris vs Frank Jones / Matthew Lampe4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Melnyk / James Williams vs ALAN SERES / Ken Willard6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Brock / COY WINN vs Stephen King / Gordon High6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-31vs WNCS King (Peachtree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEddie Johnson / Bob Harris vs Gordon High / ALAN SERES6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobert Melnyk / James Williams vs Ken Willard / Matthew Lampe6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Brock / Paul Harris vs Bradford Deudne / James Janda1-6, 3-6
2026-03-19vs WNCS King (Peachtree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesEddie Johnson / Bob Harris vs ALAN SERES / Frank Jones6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGerard Bourgeois / Charles Thomas vs Bradford Deudne / James Janda1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Melnyk / Paul Harris vs Stephen King / Gordon High6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 65+ Adult Men 3.5 Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCR Melnyk (HRC)6013512118
2WNCS King (Peachtree)0651327186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
COY WINN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Eddie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Robert Melnyk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Charles Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eddie Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gerard Bourgeois
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
COY WINN
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Eddie Johnson
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Robert Melnyk
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Charles Brock
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Eddie Carpenter
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Gerard Bourgeois
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.