Teams

Escambia - RS/Cuny

2022 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-04vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Bradford / Steven King vs Bob Olliff / Hossein Maleki6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaniel Herman / Lubomir Kaderjak vs Cosme Barrios / Russ Parris6-3, 6-3
2022-04-20vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Einhart / Charlie Skelton vs Cosme Barrios / Michael Yager7-5, 6-4
2022-04-13vs Lopez - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / William Morris vs Hossein Maleki / Bob Olliff6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrad Bradford / Rick Cuny vs Jeff Crigler / Douglas Mitchell5-7, 4-6
2022-04-06vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 30
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / William Mitchem vs Cosme Barrios / Michael Yager6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCharlie Skelton vs ELBERT WOMBLE6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDerrick Racine / Steven King vs Hossein Maleki / Russ Parris6-3, 7-5
2022-03-23vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharlie Skelton / Rick Cuny vs Hossein Maleki / Russ Parris6-1, 6-4
2022-03-16vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesRick Cuny / Derrick Racine vs Jeff Crigler / Bob Olliff6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSteven King vs Tony Beaujon6-1, 6-3
2022-03-09vs Lopez - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Derrick Racine vs Cosme Barrios / Douglas Mitchell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick Cuny / Paul Einhart vs James Johnson / RAYMOND LOPEZ3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Charlie Skelton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Brad Bradford
published 4.5
4.11
Paul Einhart
published
4.10
Steven King
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Rick Cuny
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
Daniel Herman
published 4.5
William Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Skelton + Lubomir Kaderjak6166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Charlie Skelton
34W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Brad Bradford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Paul Einhart
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Steven King
30W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Rick Cuny
100W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4.5
Daniel Herman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.76
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.