Teams

Voigt/40/WN/3-3.5-4/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 40 & Over - Women Night · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-07vs Cummer/40/WN/3-3.5-4/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Voigt / Ashlie Kyle vs Jeanna Choi / Kelly Stratton0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Benton / Lyndsey Chandler vs Catherine Reed / Dana Hicks2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Basinger / Brooke Romero vs Madeline Cummer / MLiss Sella7-6, 6-3
2025-07-31vs Wynn/40/WN/3-3.5-4/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoxanne Voigt / Vanessa Hernandez vs Amber Lewis / Dusty Rangel3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTrichel Binderim / Gina Robinson vs Trish White / Donielle Wynn3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Romero / Amy Basinger vs Tammy Rhodes / Amy Turner6-2, 6-1
2025-07-29vs Fulco/40/WN/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Romero / Crissy Burchett vs Lila Knicely / Beth Hopkins6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeslie Tuminello / Kathy Benton vs Stephanie Bass / Rhonda Terracciano6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAshlie Kyle / Trichel Binderim vs Kyla Fulco / Sara Doughty3-6, 2-6
2025-07-17vs Cummer/40/WN/3-3.5-4/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesVanessa Hernandez / Kathy Benton vs Shelly Valiulis / Brandy Hayse0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshlie Kyle / Leslie Tuminello vs Catherine Reed / Meg Frazier0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Romero / TRACEY Robinson vs Brittany Mitchell / Sonia Godfrey6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-16vs Fulco/40/WN/3-3.5-4/STCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLyndsey Chandler / Crissy Burchett vs Jennifer Octavi / Sarah Hatfield6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRoxanne Voigt / Trichel Binderim vs Rhonda Terracciano / Beth Hopkins6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer Stelly / Gina Robinson vs Ashley Farr / Laurie Oliphint1-6, 1-6
2025-07-10vs Wynn/40/WN/3-3.5-4/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesRoxanne Voigt / Trichel Binderim vs Amy Procell / Tracy Elliott7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVanessa Hernandez / Leslie Tuminello vs Rhonda Rubben / Trish White3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLyndsey Chandler / TRACEY Robinson vs Rachael Deere / Jodi Marvin3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Roxanne Voigt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Michelle Cavanaugh
published
3.36
Vanessa Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Trichel Binderim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Ashlie Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Kathy Benton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Lyndsey Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Crissy Burchett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Gina Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Amy Basinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Leslie Tuminello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Brooke Romero
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jennifer Stelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
TRACEY Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Benton + Lyndsey Chandler2343% games+8.2% vs expected
Lyndsey Chandler + Crissy Burchett4261% games+6.9% vs expected
Amy Basinger + Vanessa Hernandez8261% games+5.2% vs expected
Kathy Benton + Vanessa Hernandez6351% games−1.1% vs expected
Jennifer Stelly + Gina Robinson3252% games−2.6% vs expected
Vanessa Hernandez + Roxanne Voigt3254% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Benton + Amy Basinger134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Basinger + Crissy Burchett404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Roxanne Voigt
58W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Michelle Cavanaugh
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Vanessa Hernandez
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Trichel Binderim
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Ashlie Kyle
38W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kathy Benton
38W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Lyndsey Chandler
32W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Crissy Burchett
46W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Gina Robinson
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Amy Basinger
33W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Leslie Tuminello
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Brooke Romero
56W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jennifer Stelly
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
TRACEY Robinson
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.