Teams

Korolkoff - Chicks With Sticks

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-09vs Ferramosca - Arlington CrushesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Joanne Rome vs Caroline Mountcastle / Kathleen McKenna1-6, 3-6
2024-12-05vs Franklin - BCC 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDesiree Nichtula / Joanne Rome vs Catherine Byrne / Jennifer Winston3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Raker / Lisa Smith vs Shari Gronvall / Ivey Castleberry3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJayne Korolkoff / Kristen Moshyedi vs Amanda Franklin / Lauren Tintchev2-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs Donellan-Manor 3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Horowitz / Patricia Rose vs Kelley Donellan / Sherifa Fahmy2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDesiree Nichtula / Jody Amann vs Diana DePaul / Cybelle Long6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Raker / Kristen Moshyedi vs Joan Anson / Katie Poulos4-6, 2-6
2024-10-22vs Smith-Poaching PairsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Cooper / Gillian Moorhead vs Meghan Smith / Giuliana Rabah2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jody Amann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.33
Desiree Nichtula
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Patricia Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Joanne Rome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jayne Korolkoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Lisa Raker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Linda Wimsatt
published
3.03
Angela Ferguson
published 3.5
Kristen Moshyedi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jody Amann
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Desiree Nichtula
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Patricia Rose
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lisa Raker
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Linda Wimsatt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Angela Ferguson
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kristen Moshyedi
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.