Teams

Disrupters

2025 40&Over Mixed · 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.54 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-11vs BUF: Banks/WilbonLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Jamieson / Arthur Smith vs Paula Zagrobelny / Turhan Wilbon4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gurske-DePerio / David Schwing vs Kathleen Banks / Felix Cheng0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLu Liu / Gary Athoe vs Elisabeth Dexter / Mark Ahrens4-6, 4-6
2025-08-04vs BUF: Banks/WilbonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Boscia Smith / David Schwing vs June Brennan / Felix Cheng1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNelida Sanchez / Kamu Pindiprolu vs Amy Graybeal / Henry Burns2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLaurel Oliver / Glenn Snowden vs Nicole Conte / Turhan Wilbon6-4, 6-2
2025-07-28vs BUF: Banks/WilbonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaroline Burnicki / Gary Athoe vs Elisabeth Dexter / Mark Ahrens7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Albrecht / Glenn Snowden vs Paula Zagrobelny / Timothy Prise7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNelida Sanchez / Arthur Smith vs June Brennan / Saby George3-6, 0-6
2025-07-21vs BUF: Banks/WilbonWon 21
L#1 DoublesLu Liu / Gary Athoe vs Katalin Mechtler / Jason Galbraith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ochal / Kamu Pindiprolu vs Kathleen Banks / Saby George6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristy Jamieson / David Schwing vs Nicole Conte / Turhan Wilbon6-4, 6-2
2025-07-07vs BUF: Banks/WilbonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Boscia Smith / David Schwing vs Amy Graybeal / Henry Burns6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Gurske-DePerio / Arthur Smith vs Nicole Conte / Turhan Wilbon1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurel Oliver / Glenn Snowden vs Paula Zagrobelny / Timothy Prise6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-16vs BUF: Banks/WilbonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaroline Burnicki / Gary Athoe vs Paula Zagrobelny / Turhan Wilbon3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Ochal / David Schwing vs Kathleen Banks / Felix Cheng6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Albrecht / Glenn Snowden vs Katalin Mechtler / Jason Galbraith2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BUF: Banks/Wilbon4211717151
2Disrupters2471125184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Christy Jamieson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Hemmer
published 4
3.65
Glenn Snowden
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Gary Athoe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Jennifer Gurske-DePerio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
David Schwing
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Lu Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Arthur Smith
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Ochal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Boscia Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Laurel Oliver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Nelida Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Kamu Pindiprolu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Caroline Burnicki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Cynthia Albrecht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Ochal + Glenn Snowden6170% games+16.5% vs expected
Nelida Sanchez + Glenn Snowden3249% games+12.0% vs expected
Arthur Smith + Cynthia Albrecht1436% games−6.1% vs expected
Christy Jamieson + David Schwing5254% games−6.4% vs expected
Laurel Oliver + David Hemmer2843% games−8.3% vs expected
Arthur Smith + Lu Liu044 matchesnot enough data
Christy Jamieson + Glenn Snowden314 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + Andrea Ochal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Jamieson
47W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
David Hemmer
2W–8L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Glenn Snowden
36W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Gary Athoe
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jennifer Gurske-DePerio
52W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
David Schwing
28W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Lu Liu
57W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Arthur Smith
1W–16L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Ochal
31W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jennifer Boscia Smith
88W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Laurel Oliver
50W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
3.5
Nelida Sanchez
122W–98L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Kamu Pindiprolu
58W–115L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Burnicki
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Cynthia Albrecht
65W–91L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.